One of the most exciting and daunting aspects of being a 21st century educator is the charge of keeping up with the high rate of information exchange in a global society. No matter how specific one’s content area, there are still a multitude of competencies outside an educator’s natural skill set with which he or she must keep current. In addition, while the momentum of a knowledge driven society propels education forward, oftentimes the who one is teaching gets lost in the what one is teaching. Ironically, the former dictates the most important facet of the entire process — how the information is being presented.
In an integrated learning approach, subject matter is overlapped and presented in such a way as to eliminate disconnected concepts; it provides better overall comprehension, and highlights interdependencies in points of view and subject matter. An integrated learning approach boasts an increase in student motivation, and promotes cooperative learning. Simply put, integrated learning theory presents a combination of curriculum from two or more disciplines, to facilitate student recognition of the connectivity of ideas. Many scholars refer to the theory as a non-compartmentalized approach to education, embed in project-based learning environments.
According to Edutopia magazine, the approach has been utilized in a variety of forms for over a century, but has garnered recent attention from U.S. schools reporting great success with the approach. Among the success stories for integrated learning, are the DC Museum Magnet Schools.
The DC magnet program started in 1996, and includes two, inner-city schools – Robert Brent Elementary and Stuart Hobson Middle School. Drawing on the vast collections from the Smithsonian Institutes, the program layout is extremely unique, yet combined with traditional classwork. Student projects include original exhibitions, showcasing the information they’ve gathered, coupled with the knowledge of curator design and display methods.
Most assuredly, there are pros and cons to any instructional strategy, but I can’t help but be a little envious of these districts… envious of administrators who are willing to try something new and seemingly radical within their districts, and envious of parents who are supportive of sending their children to schools who want to shake things up a bit. It’s one thing to acknowledge the changing face of education, but another to meet those challenges with something other than the what’s been done in the past. Our students are ready for a transformation. Why aren’t we?









Recent Comments